Zapier, Make or n8n? I ask who owns it when it breaks.

A diagram on a near black background with a single acid green accent, reading from left to right. On the left, a panel labelled the failure says: a step fails during the night. Underneath, smaller grey text says that Zapier, Make and n8n can each run the same workflow. An acid green arrow points right into a taller panel outlined in acid green, labelled before the tool and headed the questions I ask. Inside it, five numbered questions are listed one under the other. One: who is alerted? Two: can the run be replayed? Three: can you see what ran and why? Four: where do the credentials live? Five: if the vendor changes its pricing at your volume, can you move? A single acid green line leaves the right side of that panel and then forks. The lower fork stays acid green, keeps its arrowhead, and points into a solid panel labelled answered, headed someone owns it, which reads: someone is alerted, the run can be replayed, you can move. The upper fork is the opposite. It turns faint grey, becomes a broken dashed line, carries no arrowhead at all, and simply stops in empty space short of its destination, with a small warm brown label above it reading no alert. The panel it fails to reach is drawn only as a faint dashed outline, labelled no answer, headed nobody is alerted, and reads: nobody knows how to debug it. The missing arrowhead and the dashed line that stops in mid air are the point of the picture: the signal that was expected at night is the thing that is not there. Across the bottom, beside a short warm brown vertical bar, two lines of warm brown text read: the cheapest automation tool is often the most expensive one, once nobody knows how to debug it.